Re: "stuck spinlock"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>
Subject: Re: "stuck spinlock"
Date: 2013-12-16 15:38:43
Message-ID: 16772.1387208323@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 2013-12-16 09:46:19 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Are they complete now?

> Hm. There's two issues I know of left, both discovered in #8673:
> - slru.c:SlruScanDirectory() doesn't support long enough
> filenames. Afaics that should be a fairly easy fix.
> - multixact/members isn't protected against wraparounds, only
> multixact/offsets is. That's a pretty longstanding bug though,
> although more likely to be hit these days.

Actually, isn't this one a must-fix as well?

http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAPweHKe5QQ1747X2c0tA=5zf4YnS2xcvGf13Opd-1Mq24rF1cQ@mail.gmail.com

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-12-16 15:52:56 Re: Review: ECPG infrastructure changes part 1, was: Re: ECPG fixes
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2013-12-16 15:21:36 Re: row security roadmap proposal