On 11/19/13, 9:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. Now that I think about it, isn't Peter proposing to break systems
> without working "inline" over here?
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/1384257026.8059.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
No, that's about const, volatile, #, and memcmp.
I don't have an informed opinion about requiring inline support
(although it would surely be nice).