Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.

From: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.
Date: 2013-10-02 14:39:15
Message-ID: 524C3013.9020903@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 10/02/2013 05:58 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0000, Albe Laurenz wrote:
>
>>> Or does that still need some C sprinkling (for operator support, say) ?
>>
>> Exactly. If you want "<" to work right for this data type
>> that's the road you have to go.
>
> I see.
>
> Whatever became of the 2011 intent to implement
> the above that's linked to in the blog post ?

Not sure about that, but I do remember this:

http://svana.org/kleptog/pgsql/taggedtypes.html

No indication of whether it will work with 9.x servers though.

>
> Karsten
>

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-10-02 15:19:58 Re: partitioning for speed, but query planner ignores
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2013-10-02 14:20:10 Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.