Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.

From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Timestamp with and without timezone conversion confusion.
Date: 2013-10-02 12:58:06
Message-ID: 20131002125806.GK4431@hermes.hilbert.loc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 11:48:02AM +0000, Albe Laurenz wrote:

>> Or does that still need some C sprinkling (for operator support, say) ?
>
> Exactly. If you want "<" to work right for this data type
> that's the road you have to go.

I see.

Whatever became of the 2011 intent to implement
the above that's linked to in the blog post ?

Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rysdam 2013-10-02 13:00:33 Re: partitioning for speed, but query planner ignores
Previous Message David Rysdam 2013-10-02 12:34:44 partitioning for speed, but query planner ignores