| From: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PG Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT |
| Date: | 2013-09-02 15:32:40 |
| Message-ID: | 5224AF98.9000905@dalibo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On 09/02/2013 04:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
>> Is there a reason, besides simple oversight, that commit
>> 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984 was not backpatched?
>> I think it needs to be.
> AFAICS, it was.
>
> Author: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
> Branch: master [073d7cb51] 2013-06-18 12:09:39 +0100
> Branch: REL9_3_STABLE [0ae1bf8c1] 2013-06-18 12:10:10 +0100
> Branch: REL9_2_STABLE [20a562f91] 2013-06-18 12:00:32 +0100
> Branch: REL9_1_STABLE [be039d4b2] 2013-06-18 12:05:48 +0100
That does seem to indicate it was. But it doesn't seem they made it to
the website:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-altertable.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-altertable.html
--
Vik
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-09-02 16:43:45 | Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2013-09-02 14:50:09 | Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT |