| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PG Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT |
| Date: | 2013-09-02 16:43:45 |
| Message-ID: | 18778.1378140225@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
> On 09/02/2013 04:50 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com> writes:
>>> Is there a reason, besides simple oversight, that commit
>>> 073d7cb513f5de44530f4bdbaaa4b5d4cce5f984 was not backpatched?
>> AFAICS, it was.
> That does seem to indicate it was. But it doesn't seem they made it to
> the website:
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-altertable.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-altertable.html
The website has the docs as of the latest releases, and we've not issued
any new minor releases since April. (Yeah, we're overdue.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vik Fearing | 2013-09-03 06:51:27 | Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2013-09-02 15:32:40 | Re: VALIDATE CONSTRAINT |