From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. SET vs. pg_dump |
Date: | 2013-08-31 19:43:25 |
Message-ID: | 5222475D.6010009@kaltenbrunner.cc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/18/2013 05:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
>> While working on upgrading the database of the search system on
>> postgresql.org to 9.2 I noticed that the dumps that pg_dump generates on
>> that system are actually invalid and cannot be reloaded without being
>> hacked on manually...
>
>> CREATE TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION pg (
>> PARSER = pg_catalog."default" );
>
>> CREATE FUNCTION test() RETURNS INTEGER
>> LANGUAGE sql SET default_text_search_config TO 'public.pg' AS $$
>> SELECT 1;
>> $$;
>
>> once you dump that you will end up with an invalid dump because the
>> function will be dumped before the actual text search configuration is
>> (re)created.
>
> I don't think it will work to try to fix this by reordering the dump;
> it's too easy to imagine scenarios where that would lead to circular
> ordering constraints. What seems like a more workable answer is for
> CREATE FUNCTION to not attempt to validate SET clauses when
> check_function_bodies is off, or at least not throw a hard error when
> the validation fails. (I see for instance that if you try
> ALTER ROLE joe SET default_text_search_config TO nonesuch;
> you just get a notice and not an error.)
>
> However, I don't recall if there are any places where we assume the
> SET info was pre-validated by CREATE/ALTER FUNCTION.
any further insights into that issue? - seems a bit silly to have an
open bug that actually prevents us from taking (restorable) backups of
the search system on our own website...
Stefan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-08-31 22:53:02 | Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. SET vs. pg_dump |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-08-31 19:40:14 | Re: [v9.4] row level security |