Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. SET vs. pg_dump

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CREATE FUNCTION .. SET vs. pg_dump
Date: 2013-08-18 15:40:47
Message-ID: 21162.1376840447@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> writes:
> While working on upgrading the database of the search system on
> postgresql.org to 9.2 I noticed that the dumps that pg_dump generates on
> that system are actually invalid and cannot be reloaded without being
> hacked on manually...

> CREATE TEXT SEARCH CONFIGURATION pg (
> PARSER = pg_catalog."default" );

> CREATE FUNCTION test() RETURNS INTEGER
> LANGUAGE sql SET default_text_search_config TO 'public.pg' AS $$
> SELECT 1;
> $$;

> once you dump that you will end up with an invalid dump because the
> function will be dumped before the actual text search configuration is
> (re)created.

I don't think it will work to try to fix this by reordering the dump;
it's too easy to imagine scenarios where that would lead to circular
ordering constraints. What seems like a more workable answer is for
CREATE FUNCTION to not attempt to validate SET clauses when
check_function_bodies is off, or at least not throw a hard error when
the validation fails. (I see for instance that if you try
ALTER ROLE joe SET default_text_search_config TO nonesuch;
you just get a notice and not an error.)

However, I don't recall if there are any places where we assume the
SET info was pre-validated by CREATE/ALTER FUNCTION.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-08-18 15:54:19 Re: pgbench / compatibility with old(er) releases
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2013-08-18 15:29:39 pgbench / compatibility with old(er) releases