Re: pure parsers and reentrant scanners

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgbuildfarm(at)rjuju(dot)net, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Subject: Re: pure parsers and reentrant scanners
Date: 2025-01-17 15:35:55
Message-ID: 51d4f4e9-b07b-433c-98cc-ab3bf53523fc@eisentraut.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09.01.25 15:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
>> The second patch contemplates raising the minimum required flex version,
>> but what to?
>
> Meh, let's just rip out the version check. It's no longer very
> relevant. Nobody is going to be using anything older than 2.5.35.
> While 2.5.35 produces compile warnings, it does still work, so
> rejecting it with a changed version check seems unnecessary.

This has been done.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nathan Bossart 2025-01-17 15:39:16 Re: Remove XLogRecGetFullXid() in xlogreader.c?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2025-01-17 15:35:48 Re: Fwd: Re: proposal: schema variables