Re: pure parsers and reentrant scanners

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgbuildfarm(at)rjuju(dot)net, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>
Subject: Re: pure parsers and reentrant scanners
Date: 2025-01-09 14:53:03
Message-ID: 1869527.1736434383@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> The second patch contemplates raising the minimum required flex version,
> but what to?

Meh, let's just rip out the version check. It's no longer very
relevant. Nobody is going to be using anything older than 2.5.35.
While 2.5.35 produces compile warnings, it does still work, so
rejecting it with a changed version check seems unnecessary.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matheus Alcantara 2025-01-09 15:22:50 Re: SCRAM pass-through authentication for postgres_fdw
Previous Message Ilia Evdokimov 2025-01-09 14:08:58 Re: Sample rate added to pg_stat_statements