Re: 9.3 Reviewer Credit WAS: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 9.3 Reviewer Credit WAS: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up
Date: 2013-08-02 21:10:17
Message-ID: 51FC2039.8070009@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce, all:

Per previous email, I wanted to make a specific proposal for what to do
on the 9.3 release notes. This is because, without policy set, we have
not been tracking which reviewers make "substantial changes" in 9.3, and
listing some-but-not-all of them would cause a lot of unhappiness among
the omitted reviewers.

Therefore, I propose for 9.3 only that we just have the list at the end
of the release notes, including all reviewers. That way we can make
sure to include everyone equally.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2013-08-02 21:23:09 Re: 9.3 Reviewer Credit WAS: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-08-02 21:07:53 Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up