From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 9.3 Reviewer Credit WAS: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |
Date: | 2013-08-02 21:23:09 |
Message-ID: | 20130802212309.GF14543@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 02:10:17PM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Bruce, all:
>
> Per previous email, I wanted to make a specific proposal for what to do
> on the 9.3 release notes. This is because, without policy set, we have
> not been tracking which reviewers make "substantial changes" in 9.3, and
> listing some-but-not-all of them would cause a lot of unhappiness among
> the omitted reviewers.
>
> Therefore, I propose for 9.3 only that we just have the list at the end
> of the release notes, including all reviewers. That way we can make
> sure to include everyone equally.
Yes, there is no way to add people to the 9.3 release note items at this
point --- my assumption is this is all 9.4 discussion, or maybe 9.5 as
we have already committed quite a bit to 9.4.
I don't think dumping reviewer names at the bottom of the 9.3 release
notes is what the majority want, and it seems like an ugly short-term
solution.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-08-02 21:24:57 | Re: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2013-08-02 21:10:17 | Re: 9.3 Reviewer Credit WAS: Kudos for Reviewers -- wrapping it up |