Re: C++ compiler

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C++ compiler
Date: 2013-06-25 01:38:48
Message-ID: 51C8F4A8.5060503@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/24/2013 05:37 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:21:26PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think the big question is whether you can _control_ what C++ features
>>>> are used, or whether you are perpetually instructing users what C++
>>>> features not to use.
>>>
>>>
>>> How is that different than us having to do the same with C?
>>
>>
>> Perhaps the size of C++ ?
>
> Right. I don't think there are any C features we want to avoid; are
> there any?

Anything supported by C99 and not other versions I would say. However,
my point is if done correctly we would state which features ahead of
time we are willing to use and make them part of the developer faq?

Sincerely,

JD

>

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2013-06-25 02:06:53 Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List
Previous Message Noah Misch 2013-06-25 01:35:53 Re: Possible bug in CASE evaluation