From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, maciej(dot)gajewski0(at)gmail(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List |
Date: | 2013-06-25 02:06:53 |
Message-ID: | 20130625020653.GB840390@tornado.leadboat.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 10:10:11AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 06/24/2013 10:02 AM, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
> > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> >> patch. The vast majority chose not to respond to my email to them at
> >> all. When private email fails, the next step is public email.
> >
> > The only problem I have here is that I don't remember about deciding to
> > publish a list of failures by public email at all. I hope it's not my
> > memory failing me here, because then I would have to remember why I
> > didn't speak up against that idea at the time.
>
> You didn't decide anything. As the CFM, I did. My job for this month
> is to make sure that 100% of patches in that queue get reviewed and
> either committed or bounced by July 15th. I'm doing my job.
+1 for trying the management practices you're trying. After the CF is closed,
we can step back and treat ourselves to a nice debate about them.
Thanks,
nm
--
Noah Misch
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-06-25 02:11:04 | Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-06-25 01:38:48 | Re: C++ compiler |