| From: | Stephen Cook <sclists(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rebecca Clarke <r(dot)clarke83(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Function tracking |
| Date: | 2013-06-07 15:24:05 |
| Message-ID: | 51B1FB15.6050502@gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 6/7/2013 6:30 AM, Rebecca Clarke wrote:
> I'm looking for suggestions on the best way to track the updates to a
> function.
>
> We have two databases, Dev & Live, so I want to update Live with just
> the functions that have been modified in the DEV databas3e.
> Is there another, easier way to track the updates than manually
> recording it in a document? (I'm trying to eliminate human interference).
>
Script the changes out and put them in source control. The small amount
of effort and discipline required will pay off big time.
-- Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ian Lawrence Barwick | 2013-06-07 15:44:57 | Re: Function tracking |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-06-07 15:20:43 | Re: PostgreSQL Synchronous Replication in production |