Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq
Date: 2006-05-04 22:07:26
Message-ID: 5141.1146780446@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:21:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> AFAIK, everything that is in exports.txt was put there for a reason.
>> I'm happy with the situation as it stands (other than wanting to enforce
>> the exports.txt restriction on more platforms ...)

> In that case, shouldn't we add to libpq-fe.h all the functions that
> libpq is exporting?

No, because we're only intending that stuff like psql and pg_dump use 'em.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2006-05-04 22:23:33 Transactions per second
Previous Message David Fetter 2006-05-04 21:39:34 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions