Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq

On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 03:21:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAIK, everything that is in exports.txt was put there for a reason.
> I'm happy with the situation as it stands (other than wanting to enforce
> the exports.txt restriction on more platforms ...)

In that case, shouldn't we add to libpq-fe.h all the functions that
libpq is exporting?

> Did we come to a decision about whether to implement symbol versioning
> for libpq?

Not really. For distributors it's nice because it means that they don't
need to recompile the entire software stack just because a new postgres
release enters the archive. But for run-of-the-mill users who compile
postgres themselves, they won't notice one way or the other.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.