Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
Date: 2007-12-06 06:54:03
Message-ID: 5121.1196924043@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> ...Further those who have provided reasonable contribution really should be
> mentioned on the contributors page that is up for discussion which would
> make the rest of this moot yes?

I don't have any objection to listing people on the contributors page
on the strength of their work on contrib modules. But that seems
orthogonal to the question of what should be in the SGML docs ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-12-06 06:57:14 Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-12-06 06:51:16 Re: release notes.. added stefan

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-12-06 06:57:14 Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-12-06 06:46:51 Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation?