From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
Date: | 2007-12-06 06:57:14 |
Message-ID: | 47579D4A.9000207@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> ...Further those who have provided reasonable contribution really should be
>> mentioned on the contributors page that is up for discussion which would
>> make the rest of this moot yes?
>
> I don't have any objection to listing people on the contributors page
> on the strength of their work on contrib modules. But that seems
> orthogonal to the question of what should be in the SGML docs ...
All I was saying is I don't think we need the redundancy :). E.g; if
they are worthy in the docs, they are worthy on the contributors page
and thus not needed in the docs.
I am not of a strong opinion either way but it seems having names
plastered everywhere just creates more management of information for no
particular purpose.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-12-06 07:02:10 | Re: release notes.. added stefan |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-06 06:54:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-12-06 08:54:16 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-12-06 06:54:03 | Re: [HACKERS] Uniform policy for author credits in contrib module documentation? |