From: | Jeffrey Jones <jjones(at)toppan-f(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken? |
Date: | 2013-02-15 02:04:23 |
Message-ID: | 511D97A7.2050805@toppan-f.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Stephen.
On 15/02/13 10:52, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Jeffrey Jones (jjones(at)toppan-f(dot)co(dot)jp) wrote:
>> I downloaded http://yum.postgresql.org/9.2/redhat/rhel-6Server-x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2
>> using wget on the afected computer and ran md5sum over it with the
>> following result:
>>
>> 9258bd5672cf7abb55a0d95ee2467afc primary.sqlite.bz2
> That's pretty cute. I get:
>
> sfrost(at)tamriel:/home/sfrost> md5sum primary.sqlite.bz2
> 168232945d791e55e56bb29757458157 primary.sqlite.bz2
>
> Which matches an md5sum run on the file on the server directly and the
> file timestamp indicates that it hasn't changed for ~2 days.
>
> Have you tried opening the file you end up receiving and inspecting it?
> Something is clearly off if you're getting a different md5sum.
Thanks for the confirmation (Love the machine name by the way), based on
your info it does look like something between myself and
yum.postresql.org is causing trouble.
>> I have downloaded it from a few separate computers and they all
>> return that same result.
> Can you try from a system that isn't attached to your corporate network?
Yea, I think I will have to try from home as well.
>
>> I also extracted and looked at the sqlite file with sqliteman and
>> it worked without trouble. If there really was a problem then I
>> would have expected sqliteman to fail reading the file.
> Agreed, that's curious- perhaps there's a cacheing transparent proxy in
> the corporate network that's feeding you an older, but otherwise valid,
> file?
I shall contact the network bods and see if they can offer any enlightenment
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
Thanks for taking the time out to confirm. At least we now know it is
probably not yum.postgresql.org or my actual machines
cheers
Jeff
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jack Christensen | 2013-02-15 02:31:06 | Re: Avoiding duplication of code via views -- slower? How do people typically do this? |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-02-15 01:52:29 | Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken? |