From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Jeffrey Jones <jjones(at)toppan-f(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken? |
Date: | 2013-02-15 01:52:29 |
Message-ID: | 20130215015229.GD16126@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
* Jeffrey Jones (jjones(at)toppan-f(dot)co(dot)jp) wrote:
> I downloaded http://yum.postgresql.org/9.2/redhat/rhel-6Server-x86_64/repodata/primary.sqlite.bz2
> using wget on the afected computer and ran md5sum over it with the
> following result:
>
> 9258bd5672cf7abb55a0d95ee2467afc primary.sqlite.bz2
That's pretty cute. I get:
sfrost(at)tamriel:/home/sfrost> md5sum primary.sqlite.bz2
168232945d791e55e56bb29757458157 primary.sqlite.bz2
Which matches an md5sum run on the file on the server directly and the
file timestamp indicates that it hasn't changed for ~2 days.
Have you tried opening the file you end up receiving and inspecting it?
Something is clearly off if you're getting a different md5sum.
> I have downloaded it from a few separate computers and they all
> return that same result.
Can you try from a system that isn't attached to your corporate network?
> I also extracted and looked at the sqlite file with sqliteman and
> it worked without trouble. If there really was a problem then I
> would have expected sqliteman to fail reading the file.
Agreed, that's curious- perhaps there's a cacheing transparent proxy in
the corporate network that's feeding you an older, but otherwise valid,
file?
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeffrey Jones | 2013-02-15 02:04:23 | Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken? |
Previous Message | Jeffrey Jones | 2013-02-15 00:57:27 | Re: 9.2 RHEL6 yum Repository broken? |