| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: azpug@postgresql.org |
| Date: | 2013-02-14 21:00:32 |
| Message-ID: | 511D5070.60202@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 02/12/2013 11:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 02/12/2013 02:04 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>
>> On 02/12/2013 12:36 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/12/2013 12:32 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> Uhm, so I take it AZ is Arizona. I don't object to the idea, but I
>>>> note
>>>> that AZ is also the 2-letter country code for Azerbaijan. IIRC
>>>> somebody
>>>> proposed using airport codes for PUG names to avoid conflicts; that
>>>> would make it PHXPUG I think, which sounds pretty horrible to me. I
>>>> admit we don't hear much from Azeri users, so maybe AZPUG is okay?
>>
>> Yeah, I think an Azerbaijan user group is unlikely, at best.
>>
>> Mind you, if the list needs modification *anyway*, is there something
>> wrong with using ArizonaPUG(at)postgresql(dot)org?
>
> That seems a reasonable compromise.
yeah - I don't think we should use azpug@ for arizona and shadow an
entire country so I would thing that arizonapug@ seems like a sensible
alternative
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-02-14 21:10:39 | Re: azpug@postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2013-02-14 20:58:12 | Re: Proposed changes to security.html |