| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: azpug@postgresql.org |
| Date: | 2013-02-14 21:10:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20130214211039.GI4747@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> On 02/12/2013 11:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> >> Mind you, if the list needs modification *anyway*, is there something
> >> wrong with using ArizonaPUG(at)postgresql(dot)org?
> >
> > That seems a reasonable compromise.
>
> yeah - I don't think we should use azpug@ for arizona and shadow an
> entire country so I would thing that arizonapug@ seems like a sensible
> alternative
And how about US-Ariz-pug? The ISO code for Arizona is US-AZ; we could
do that too.
I want something that has gotten at least *some* discussion, thought,
and agreement, not the first thing that crosses our minds. It's a name
that we're going to be stuck with for a long time, because it's damn
hard to change list names. I note none of the guys from AZ have
actually said anything.
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2013-02-14 21:14:20 | Re: azpug@postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2013-02-14 21:00:32 | Re: azpug@postgresql.org |