Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
Date: 2013-02-12 18:03:27
Message-ID: 511A83EF.2030801@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> To be honest, I don't really think thats fair to the patch. I don't see
> much that can be made smaller as long as the "one file for all
> persistent settings" dogma is upheld which more people seem to vote for
> (exluding me).

I'm not a fan of "one file to rule them all" either. Hovever, I'm
strongly in favor of anything that can get into 9.3. So if we can make
a 9.3 patch out of this by doing "file-per-setting", then I'm all for it.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-02-12 18:27:21 Re: pgsql: Create libpgcommon, and move pg_malloc et al to it
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2013-02-12 16:55:49 Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]