| From: | Zoltán Böszörményi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>, 'Craig Ringer' <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, 'Hans-Jürgen Schönig' <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, 'Ants Aasma' <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, 'PostgreSQL Hackers' <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, 'Amit kapila' <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request |
| Date: | 2013-01-31 21:12:01 |
| Message-ID: | 510ADE21.3060709@cybertec.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2013-01-31 19:38 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Zolt=E1n_B=F6sz=F6rm=E9nyi?= <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
>> Thanks. A question though: how does "make check" or "make installcheck"
>> chooses between the *.out and its different *_N.out incarnations?
>> I couldn't find traces of prepared_xacts_1.out in any file saying "this
>> is the one to be used in this-and-this" configuration. Does the procedure
>> check against all versions and the least different one is reported?
> Exactly. This is documented, see the "regression tests" chapter of the
> SGML manual.
>
> regards, tom lane
Thanks.
I tested my patch with installcheck and installcheck-parallel
using max_prepared_transactions=0 in the server and
it passed that way too.
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-01-31 22:06:15 | Re: json api WIP patch |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-01-31 20:49:36 | Re: Privileges for INFORMATION_SCHEMA.SCHEMATA (was Re: Small clarification in "34.41. schemata") |