Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Zoltán Böszörményi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hari Babu <haribabu(dot)kommi(at)huawei(dot)com>, "'Craig Ringer'" <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, 'Hans-Jürgen Schönig' <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "'Ants Aasma'" <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "'PostgreSQL Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "'Amit kapila'" <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request
Date: 2013-01-31 18:38:07
Message-ID: 16962.1359657487@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Zolt=E1n_B=F6sz=F6rm=E9nyi?= <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> Thanks. A question though: how does "make check" or "make installcheck"
> chooses between the *.out and its different *_N.out incarnations?
> I couldn't find traces of prepared_xacts_1.out in any file saying "this
> is the one to be used in this-and-this" configuration. Does the procedure
> check against all versions and the least different one is reported?

Exactly. This is documented, see the "regression tests" chapter of the
SGML manual.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-01-31 19:33:53 Re: pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery.
Previous Message Zoltán Böszörményi 2013-01-31 17:27:22 Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request