Re: How to get more than 2^32 BLOBs

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Donato Marrazzo <donato(dot)marrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: How to get more than 2^32 BLOBs
Date: 2020-04-08 12:04:59
Message-ID: 50a88c5152f9dee204f1c10a95dd90651585efcb.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 12:12 +0200, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
>
> Il giorno mer 8 apr 2020 alle ore 12:06 Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 2020-04-08 at 11:15 +0200, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
> > > according this page [1], large object are limited to the OID range of 2^32 (since it's a 4 bytes number).
> > > I'm working on a use case were there are many tables with blobs (on average not so large 32KB).
> > > I foresee that in 2-3 years time frame, the limit of overall blobs will be breached: more than 2^32 blobs.
> > >
> > > - Is there a way to change the OID limit?
> > > - Should we switch to a bytea implementation?
> > > - Are there any drawback of bytea except the maximum space?
> >
> > Don't use large objects. They are only useful if
> > 1) you have files larger than 1GB or
> > 2) you need to stream writes
> >
> > There are no such limitations if you use the "bytea" data type, and it is
> > much simpler to handle at the same time.
>
> Are you aware of any performance drawback?

No; in fact, "bytea" performs better.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Donato Marrazzo 2020-04-08 13:14:24 Re: How to get more than 2^32 BLOBs
Previous Message Christophe Courtois 2020-04-08 11:41:26 Re: How to get more than 2^32 BLOBs