Re: Yet Another Timestamp Question: Time Defaults

From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
To: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Cc: Gavan Schneider <pg-gts(at)snkmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Yet Another Timestamp Question: Time Defaults
Date: 2013-01-22 17:41:58
Message-ID: 50FECF66.50407@pinpointresearch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/22/2013 09:37 AM, Gavin Flower wrote:
> On 23/01/13 06:30, Gavan Schneider wrote:
>> On 01/21/2013 07:40 PM, Steve Crawford wrote:
> [...]
>> (While I suppose some politician somewhere could decide that
>> "fall-back" could cross date boundaries, I am unaware of any place
>> that has ever done something so pathological as to have the same date
>> occur in two non-contiguous pieces once every year.)
> [...]
>
> Don't tempt the gods!!! :-)
>

Sorry. :)

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rich Shepard 2013-01-22 17:57:23 Restore 1 Table from pg_dumpall?
Previous Message Gavin Flower 2013-01-22 17:37:14 Re: Yet Another Timestamp Question: Time Defaults