| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)it> |
| Cc: | damien clochard <damien(at)dalibo(dot)info>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL WWW <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Training approval policy on pg.org |
| Date: | 2013-01-10 22:54:56 |
| Message-ID: | 50EF46C0.7060204@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> My point of view is that, as things stand currently, this is a false
> problem. Publishing of training events (contrary to what happens with
> conferences/community events) does not harm anyone if the publisher is a
> company that is considered to be reliable. Nobody gets bombed with
> emails or spam, the training events simply sit there, in a separate page.
It's not a false problem. That policy was created in specific response
to a specific problem from a company which (as far as I know) still
exists and will return to abusing our system if we let them.
We probably want a new policy, but it needs to be one which does not
allow casual abuse.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gabriele Bartolini | 2013-01-10 23:22:10 | Re: Training approval policy on pg.org |
| Previous Message | Jaime Casanova | 2013-01-10 22:12:54 | Re: Training approval policy on pg.org |