Re: Great site for comparing databases (or anything else)

From: Emi Lu <emilu(at)encs(dot)concordia(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Great site for comparing databases (or anything else)
Date: 2012-12-06 19:15:29
Message-ID: 50C0EED1.7080703@encs.concordia.ca
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> It seems to be based on the honor system. When you click "Rank", it
> asks you what databases you're familiar with. Then you can stack rank
> those databases across various questions. It's possible people could
> lie and say they know about mySQL and Postgres when in reality they
> don't, but hopefully the overall results would be accurate. Actually
> one of the reasons I posted it here was because I was hoping more
> database experts could weigh in with their opinions..
>
> Mike
>
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Stephen Cook <sclists(at)gmail(dot)com
> <mailto:sclists(at)gmail(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> On 10/27/2012 5:18 PM, Mike Christensen wrote:
>
> Just came across this one:
>
> http://hammerprinciple.com/__databases/items/mysql/__postgresql
> <http://hammerprinciple.com/databases/items/mysql/postgresql>
>
> mySQL is great for embedding in applications though? Have they
> not read Oracle's license?
>
>
> Does it say anywhere on that site if the people surveyed know both
> databases well enough to judge these questions? I can't find
> anything about that, and the site also ranks gin and martial arts,
> so I'm not sure sure it has much value.
I saw lots of discussion about the results shown in the website. I would
say that it is always good to have something to start with. And I vote
for it.
--
Emi

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adrian Klaver 2012-12-06 20:25:29 Re: Trigger / constraint issue
Previous Message Condor 2012-12-06 18:41:44 Re: character encoding