| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker |
| Date: | 2012-12-03 15:57:03 |
| Message-ID: | 50BCCBCF.9030304@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/03/2012 04:44 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Is there anything to be gained *now* from merging those two concepts?
>> I saw that as refactoring that can occur once we are happy it should
>> take place, but isn't necessary.
>
> IMO it's a net loss in robustness of the autovac implementation.
Agreed.
That's only one aspect of it, though. From the other point of view, it
would be a proof of stability for the bgworker implementation if
autovacuum worked on top of it.
Regards
Markus Wanner
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2012-12-03 16:09:35 | Re: [v9.3] Row-Level Security |
| Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2012-12-03 15:51:22 | Re: Review: Extra Daemons / bgworker |