Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2

From: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr(dot)rosas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2
Date: 2012-11-08 15:43:58
Message-ID: 509BD33E.2030802@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Em 08-11-2012 13:38, Alvaro Herrera escreveu:
> Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas escribió:
>> Em 07-11-2012 22:58, Tom Lane escreveu:
>>> Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas<rr(dot)rosas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Ok, I could finally strip part of my database schema that will allow you
>>>> to run the explain query and reproduce the issue.
>>>> There is a simple SQL dump in plain format that you can restore both on
>>>> 9.1 and 9.2 and an example EXPLAIN query so that you can see the
>>>> difference between both versions.
>>>> Please keep me up to date with regards to any progress. Let me know if
>>>> the commit above fixed this issue.
>>> AFAICT, HEAD and 9.2 branch tip plan this query a bit faster than 9.1
>>> does.
>> Great! What is the estimate for 9.2.2 release?
> Hasn't been announced, but you can grab a snapshot right now from
> ftp.postgresql.org if you want.

Thank you, Álvaro, but I prefer to use official Debian packages instead
since they are easier to manage and more integrated to our OS.

For now I have rolled back to 9.1 this morning and it is working fine,
so I don't have any rush. I just want an estimate to know when I should
try upgrading 9.2 from experimental again after 9.2.2 is released.

Cheers,
Rodrigo.

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Petr Praus 2012-11-08 18:23:03 Re: Re: Increasing work_mem and shared_buffers on Postgres 9.2 significantly slows down queries
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-11-08 15:38:45 Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2