Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr(dot)rosas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2
Date: 2012-11-08 15:38:45
Message-ID: 20121108153845.GD7225@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas escribió:
> Em 07-11-2012 22:58, Tom Lane escreveu:
> >Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas<rr(dot)rosas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >>Ok, I could finally strip part of my database schema that will allow you
> >>to run the explain query and reproduce the issue.
> >>There is a simple SQL dump in plain format that you can restore both on
> >>9.1 and 9.2 and an example EXPLAIN query so that you can see the
> >>difference between both versions.
> >>Please keep me up to date with regards to any progress. Let me know if
> >>the commit above fixed this issue.
> >AFAICT, HEAD and 9.2 branch tip plan this query a bit faster than 9.1
> >does.
>
> Great! What is the estimate for 9.2.2 release?

Hasn't been announced, but you can grab a snapshot right now from
ftp.postgresql.org if you want.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas 2012-11-08 15:43:58 Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2
Previous Message Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas 2012-11-08 15:30:39 Re: Query completed in < 1s in PG 9.1 and ~ 700s in PG 9.2