From: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Cook <sclists(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mike Christensen <mike(at)kitchenpc(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Great site for comparing databases (or anything else) |
Date: | 2012-10-27 23:17:45 |
Message-ID: | 508C6B99.5000502@archidevsys.co.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 28/10/12 12:00, Stephen Cook wrote:
> On 10/27/2012 5:18 PM, Mike Christensen wrote:
>> Just came across this one:
>>
>> http://hammerprinciple.com/databases/items/mysql/postgresql
>>
>> mySQL is great for embedding in applications though? Have they not
>> read Oracle's license?
>
> Does it say anywhere on that site if the people surveyed know both
> databases well enough to judge these questions? I can't find anything
> about that, and the site also ranks gin and martial arts, so I'm not
> sure sure it has much value.
>
> -- Stephen
>
>
Probably a very useful site to note people's 'perceptions' - as
perceptions tend to influence peoples decisions, especially when people
feel overwhelmed by technical decision making.
Also note that for features that are obviously complicated or advanced,
Postgres tends to a lot better than MySQL.
For the above reasons, I think it may be of value to the pg community to
look at it in order to consider what are marketing messages should be.
Cheers,
Gavin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Leif Biberg Kristensen | 2012-10-27 23:29:15 | Re: Great site for comparing databases (or anything else) |
Previous Message | Mike Christensen | 2012-10-27 23:12:01 | Re: Great site for comparing databases (or anything else) |