Re: How to upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 with replication?

From: Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>
To: Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>
Cc: delongboy <sdelong(at)saucontech(dot)com>, <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2 with replication?
Date: 2012-10-19 14:51:17
Message-ID: 508168E5.6020707@optionshouse.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 10/19/2012 09:44 AM, Karl Denninger wrote:

> For really BIG databases (as opposed to moderately-big) this could be a
> much-more material problem than it is for me.

Which reminds me. I really wish pg_basebackup let you specify an
alternative compression handler. We've been using pigz on our systems
because our database is so large. It cuts backup time drastically, from
about 2.5 hours to 28 minutes.

Until a CPU can compress at the same speed it can read data from disk
devices, that's going to continue to be a problem. Parallel compression
is great.

So even after our recent upgrade, we've kept using our home-grown backup
system. :(

--
Shaun Thomas
OptionsHouse | 141 W. Jackson Blvd. | Suite 500 | Chicago IL, 60604
312-444-8534
sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com

______________________________________________

See http://www.peak6.com/email_disclaimer/ for terms and conditions related to this email

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shaun Thomas 2012-10-19 14:54:14 Re: Tablespace-derived stats?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-10-19 14:51:07 Re: Tablespace-derived stats?