From: | Andrew Hastie <andrew(at)ahastie(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade: out of memory |
Date: | 2012-10-01 11:51:28 |
Message-ID: | 506983C0.8020505@ahastie.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Tom/Matthew,
Just to chime in on this thread - I'm currently validating Postgres on
AIXv7.1 and confirm that I also see the same error. I can reproduce the
error with 9.2.1 and 9.2.0 but unlike Matthew I'm using a built from
source build using the IBM xcl compiler rather than gcc.
I don't believe this is data limit related as I see the error when
dumping database "template1" under user "postgres". Here's the output:-
[eg17ph01:ahastie] /ahastie $ pg_dump -v -U postgres template1 > test.psql
Password:
pg_dump: reading schemas
pg_dump: reading user-defined tables
pg_dump: reading extensions
pg_dump: reading user-defined functions
pg_dump: reading user-defined types
pg_dump: reading procedural languages
pg_dump: reading user-defined aggregate functions
pg_dump: out of memory
[eg17ph01:ahastie] /ahastie $ xlc -qversion
IBM XL C/C++ for AIX, V12.1 (5765-J02, 5725-C72)
Version: 12.01.0000.0001
I've tried the requested SQL query which returns zero rows. Is this as
expected ?
I will try the same with release 9.1.6 to see if we can pinpoint this as
a potential AIX only issue or a 9.2.n issue. Also to confirm what
Matthew has observed.
Regards,
Andrew
On 28/09/12 16:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Carrington, Matthew (Produban)" <Matthew(dot)Carrington(at)produban(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> Reading symbols from /ukmetmon/data/dataCollection/postgres_9.2.1/bin/pg_dump...(no debugging symbols found)...done.
> ... hm, not sure why that didn't work, but anyway:
>
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0 0x000000010002e354 in exit_horribly ()
>> #1 0x000000010003243c in pg_malloc ()
>> #2 0x0000000100008f14 in getAggregates ()
>> #3 0x000000010002fcac in getSchemaData ()
>> #4 0x0000000100001330 in main ()
> getAggregates() doesn't do that much. Can we see the results of the
> query it would have been executing, namely
>
> SELECT tableoid, oid, proname AS aggname,
> pronamespace AS aggnamespace,
> pronargs, proargtypes,
> (SELECT rolname FROM pg_catalog.pg_roles WHERE oid = proowner) AS rolname,
> proacl AS aggacl
> FROM pg_proc p
> WHERE proisagg AND (
> pronamespace !=
> (SELECT oid FROM pg_namespace WHERE nspname = 'pg_catalog')
> OR EXISTS(SELECT 1 FROM pg_depend WHERE
> classid = 'pg_proc'::regclass AND
> objid = p.oid AND
> refclassid = 'pg_extension'::regclass AND
> deptype = 'e'));
>
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Moshe Jacobson | 2012-10-01 13:36:13 | What's faster? BEGIN ... EXCEPTION or CREATE TEMP TABLE IF NOT EXISTS? |
Previous Message | raghu ram | 2012-10-01 10:44:33 | Re: Again, problem with pgbouncer |