| From: | "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Oleg Bartunov" <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestion for improving Archives |
| Date: | 2004-09-04 19:14:54 |
| Message-ID: | 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE5618D@rodrick.geeknet.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> the followign was searching "nested transaction support":
>
> "Documents 1-10 of total 383 found. Searching in 390035
> documents took
> 4.714 seconds."
>
> Not what I'd consider "slow" ... granted, that last one on
> Google too .2 seconds, but when we can build a server farm
> like them, then I'll be worried about 4secs vs .2 :)
>
And the archives is currently being crawled, and there was a vacuum
running (heavy db load).
nested transaction support:
Documents 1-10 of total 383 found. Searching in 390035 documents took
0.104 seconds.
... John
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-09-04 19:57:47 | Re: Suggestion for improving Archives |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-09-04 19:10:16 | Re: Suggestion for improving Archives |