Re: Suggestion for improving Archives

On Sat, 4 Sep 2004, Josh Berkus wrote:

> Guys,
>
>> However, only one of those resources, pgsql.ru, could be made to make
>> available new threads on an hourly basis, or maybe even realtime.
>>
>> Either way, I'm not fuzzed, whichever works the best.
>
> Hmmmm .....
>
> ===========================
> Click to Search the Archives:
>
> -- PGSQL.ru's Full Text Search of Archives using OpenFTS (fast, all PostgreSQL
> sites)
>
> -- Google Groups (fast, general search of Usenet and PostgreSQL mailing lists)
>
> -- Monharc Archive Search (slow but includes up-to-the-last-hour posts)

When is the last time you used the search on archives.postgresql.org? The
following was searching mvcc:

"Documents 1-10 of total 1576 found. Searching in 390035 documents took
0.037 seconds."

the following was searching 'wal vadim':

"Documents 1-10 of total 880 found. Searching in 390035 documents took
0.441 seconds."

the following was searching "postgresql releases 8.0":

"Documents 1-10 of total 2190 found. Searching in 390035 documents took
1.882 seconds."

the followign was searching "nested transaction support":

"Documents 1-10 of total 383 found. Searching in 390035 documents took
4.714 seconds."

Not what I'd consider "slow" ... granted, that last one on Google too .2
seconds, but when we can build a server farm like them, then I'll be
worried about 4secs vs .2 :)

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664