Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem

From: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "John Hansen" <john(at)geeknet(dot)com(dot)au>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tatsuo Ishii" <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem
Date: 2005-05-04 04:13:50
Message-ID: 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A92F1@rodrick.geeknet.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Errm.. UTF-16/32

> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of John Hansen
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 1:22 PM
> To: Tom Lane; Tatsuo Ishii
> Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] A proper fix for the
> conversion-function problem
>
> > Are there any encodings we care about that require embedded zero
> bytes?
>
> UTF-8 does!
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2005-05-04 04:14:23 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2005-05-04 04:13:26 Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement