Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: inclusions WAS: Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-04 04:13:26
Message-ID: 200505032113.27332.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew,

> OK, *you* choose. I'm getting a little annoyed with how many people tell
> me "oh, it should be easy to pick the stuff to include with standard
> PostgreSQL", and then expect core to do the choosing.

Sorry, that came off kinda harsh. Seriously, I personally would love to see
a proposal of a coherent system of what should and should not get included.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Hansen 2005-05-04 04:13:50 Re: A proper fix for the conversion-function problem
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-05-04 04:02:30 Re: pg_locks needs a facelift