From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Draft release notes complete |
Date: | 2012-09-06 03:33:35 |
Message-ID: | 5048198F.8030306@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/05/2012 11:01 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
>> The buildfarm code does not run if there are no changes. The job
>> runs, sees that there are no changes, and exits.
> Right, hence it makes great sense to use it for this (as opposed to
> Bruce's previous script or some other new one). While it might appear
> to be overkill, it actually does lots of useful and good things and
> integrates better with the existing setup anyway.
>
> Now that you've provided the magic sauce wrt --skip-steps, can we get an
> admin to implement a doc-only build that runs more frequently to update
> the dev docs..?
>
> Andrew, if we're going to rely on that, even just internally, perhaps we
> should go ahead and add documentation for it?
>
>
You mean in my copious spare time?
AIUI the only thing stopping the admins from doing what is wanted is a
shortage of tuits. I suspect if we're all a tiny bit patient it will happen.
But I guess they can speak for themselves.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2012-09-06 03:43:45 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav |
Previous Message | Greg Smith | 2012-09-06 03:20:29 | Re: [repost] Help me develop new commit_delay advice |