Re: Draft release notes complete

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Draft release notes complete
Date: 2012-09-06 03:44:20
Message-ID: 20120906034420.GN1267@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Andrew Dunstan (andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net) wrote:
> You mean in my copious spare time?

If you're alright with the concept, then anyone can do it. I was
looking more for your concurrence on the idea of documenting this
explicitly (which also implies that it'll be supported, etc).

I'd be happy to develop the actual patch to add the documentation.

> AIUI the only thing stopping the admins from doing what is wanted is
> a shortage of tuits. I suspect if we're all a tiny bit patient it
> will happen.

I agree that they'll now get to it, based off your explanation of how to
use --skip-steps, and it'll be done and good.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-09-06 03:54:21 Re: Draft release notes complete
Previous Message Greg Smith 2012-09-06 03:43:45 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Revert "commit_delay" change; just add comment that we don't hav