Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion

From: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)elevated-dev(dot)com>
To: richard coleman <rcoleman(dot)ascentgl(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rui DeSousa <rui(at)crazybean(dot)net>, Ron <ronljohnsonjr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion
Date: 2023-05-01 14:48:08
Message-ID: 5004BDBB-612B-4969-A7FA-7174534FD959@elevated-dev.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

> On May 1, 2023, at 8:34 AM, richard coleman <rcoleman(dot)ascentgl(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> As I've asked Ron, if pg_dump isn't fit for purpose, then what do you believe is?

He didn't say pg_dump wasn't fit for purpose. He said use a binary format and multiple processes--which are pg_dump options.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message richard coleman 2023-05-01 15:10:31 Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion
Previous Message Ron 2023-05-01 14:40:32 Re: pg_dump why no indicator of completion