From: | Mark Thomas <thomas(at)pbegames(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problems with pg_dump |
Date: | 2002-12-16 21:36:33 |
Message-ID: | 5.1.0.14.2.20021216163534.02305070@pbegames.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
At 04:19 PM 12/16/02 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>papapep <papapep(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> >>> You mean you're doing
> >>> pg_dump ... >DATABASE.out
> >>> where DATABASE.out already exists and is marked read-only?
>
> > No. It exists after doing pg_dump....etc,etc.. Before I've removed it
> > to avoid these problems.
>
>That's odd.
>
> > But the question is, how is that pg_dump creates a file with
> > read-only permissions?....astonishing for me....is it the default
> > profile?? It isn't written in any of the docs I've read about it.
>
>Well, pg_dump is not creating the file in this situation --- your shell
>is. So it's got to have something to do with shell settings. May I
>inquire what you have "umask" set to? Also, just exactly what
>permissions is the file created with (ls -l output would be good).
ls -ld . would be useful too. Could have setuid on for someone other than
the user.
Mark Thomas
---
thomas(at)pbegames(dot)com ----> http://www.pbegames.com/~thomas
Play by Electron Games -> http://www.pbegames.com Free Trial Games
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-12-16 21:41:56 | Re: Redhat Database ??? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2002-12-16 21:28:37 | Re: Redhat Database ??? |