From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | papapep <papapep(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Problems with pg_dump |
Date: | 2002-12-16 21:19:22 |
Message-ID: | 28422.1040073562@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
papapep <papapep(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>> You mean you're doing
>>> pg_dump ... >DATABASE.out
>>> where DATABASE.out already exists and is marked read-only?
> No. It exists after doing pg_dump....etc,etc.. Before I've removed it
> to avoid these problems.
That's odd.
> But the question is, how is that pg_dump creates a file with
> read-only permissions?....astonishing for me....is it the default
> profile?? It isn't written in any of the docs I've read about it.
Well, pg_dump is not creating the file in this situation --- your shell
is. So it's got to have something to do with shell settings. May I
inquire what you have "umask" set to? Also, just exactly what
permissions is the file created with (ls -l output would be good).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Whelan | 2002-12-16 21:24:13 | Batch Table Creation - Foreign Key Problem |
Previous Message | ghaverla | 2002-12-16 20:01:01 | Re: Problems with pg_dump |