From: | "Atri Sharma" <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Dave Page'" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "'Pg Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012 |
Date: | 2012-03-17 19:16:54 |
Message-ID: | 4f64e32d.8a37440a.5ef7.ffffd053@mx.google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Dave,
I believe,with the ALTER command,we plan to give the user power to modify
ordering . Don't we?
Atri
From: Dave Page [mailto:dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org]
Sent: 18 March 2012 00:46
To: Atri Sharma
Cc: Alvaro Herrera; Pg Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012
On Saturday, March 17, 2012, Atri Sharma <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi Alvaro,
> Thanks for going through my description.
>
>
> I was going through the posts,when I realised that if we give each client
the flexibility of defining his/her own order with complete control,that
would be probably the right way(IMHO).
>
> I mean,if the user sees,not the physical implementation,but a customizable
interface instead,which is mapped to the physical implementation,then,we can
solve to some extent,the problem of logical/physical decoupling.
Anything done in the client bar changing the column it orders on (which
ideally should be avoided too if practical) is going to lead to pain and
suffering as some will do it, some won't, and a few might get it wrong.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2012-03-17 19:34:24 | Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012 |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2012-03-17 19:15:30 | Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012 |