From: | "Atri Sharma" <atri(dot)jiit(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | "'Pg Hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012 |
Date: | 2012-03-17 19:07:49 |
Message-ID: | 4f64e10a.a123440a.432f.ffffc7f3@mx.google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Alvaro,
Thanks for going through my description.
I was going through the posts,when I realised that if we give each client the flexibility of defining his/her own order with complete control,that would be probably the right way(IMHO).
I mean,if the user sees,not the physical implementation,but a customizable interface instead,which is mapped to the physical implementation,then,we can solve to some extent,the problem of logical/physical decoupling.
If you are free,I can come on IRC right now and explain my idea to you.
Atri
-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com]
Sent: 18 March 2012 00:34
To: Atri Sharma
Cc: Pg Hackers
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012
Excerpts from Atri Sharma's message of sáb mar 17 15:48:13 -0300 2012:
>
> HI Alvaro,
> I did send a complete description to the mailing list, based on your past discussions. I don’t know if you got it.
I read it, but I don't see how is the client involved.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Page | 2012-03-17 19:15:30 | Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-03-17 19:04:18 | Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012 |