Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql

On 04/09/2017 02:04 PM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 04/08/2017 07:29 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> * Joe Conway (mail(at)joeconway(dot)com) wrote:
>>> On 04/07/2017 05:36 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> > On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 5:22 PM, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
>>> >> 1) commit the 0002 patch now before the feature freeze and follow up
>>> >> with the regression test patch when ready in a couple of days
>>> >> 2) hold off on both patches until ready
>>> >> 3) push both patches to the next commitfest/pg11
>>> >>
>>> >> Some argue this is an open issue against the new partitioning feature in
>>> >> pg10 and therefore should be addressed now, and others do not. I can see
>>> >> both sides of that argument.
>>> >>
>>> >> In any case, thoughts on what to do?
>>> >
>>> > Speaking only for myself, I'm OK with any of those options, provided
>>> > that that "a couple" means what my dictionary says it means.
>>>
>>> Thanks. I'd prefer not to do #1 actually, and I think we can adhere to
>>> the dictionary meaning of "a couple" (i.e. by EOD Sunday). Assuming we
>>> are ready by Sunday I will push both together (#2) or else I will move
>>> them both together to the next CF (#3).
>>
>> Sounds good to me.
>
> Having heard no objections, committed and pushed as per option #2.

Interesting -- rhino is now failing. I tested a minute ago manually on
the same buildfarm animal and it passed. I'm on it.

Joe

--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development