Re: missing isinf declaration on solaris

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: missing isinf declaration on solaris
Date: 2017-04-09 21:22:50
Message-ID: 20170409212250.gjhsg6xm4qasslje@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-09-24 16:26:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > On 9/24/14 9:21 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Agreed, but what about non-GCC compilers?
>
> > Stick AC_PROG_CC_C99 into configure.in.
>
> I think that's a bad idea, unless you mean to do it only on Solaris.
> If we do that unconditionally, we will pretty much stop getting any
> warnings about C99-isms on modern platforms.

FWIW, that's not that much of an issue these days, because e.g. mylodon
runs with -std=c89 -Werror=c99-extensions - so far that seems to have been
reasonably accurate.

- Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2017-04-09 21:28:48 Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Previous Message Joe Conway 2017-04-09 21:04:45 Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql