| From: | "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft |
| Date: | 2024-05-19 21:10:10 |
| Message-ID: | 4b11112f-00ea-435e-82e0-e640d27a8e18@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/16/24 1:15 AM, Bertrand Drouvot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:45:35PM -0400, Jonathan S. Katz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Attached is a copy of the PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft.
>
> Thanks for working on it!
>
> I've one comment:
>
>> PostgreSQL 17 also introduces a new view, [`pg_wait_events`](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/view-pg-wait-events.html), which provides descriptions about wait events and can be combined with `pg_stat_activity` to give more insight into an operation.
>
> Instead of "to give more insight into an operation", what about "to give more
> insight about what a session is waiting for (should it be active)"?
I put:
"to give more in insight into why a session is blocked."
Does that work?
Jonathan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2024-05-19 21:25:00 | Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft |
| Previous Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2024-05-19 21:07:07 | Re: PostgreSQL 17 Beta 1 release announcement draft |